AI judging panel · Gemma 4 × ElevenLabs

Put yourhackathonideaon trial.

Pitch it in a few sentences. A panel of AI judges and investors sits down at the round table, argues about it out loud, and hand you a score you can actually use.

6 judges · 10 arguments
1 verdict · 0 mercy

Step 1 · pitch it

A plant that texts you when it's thirsty, in the voice of a disappointed parent✦Turn any lecture recording into a 5-minute podcast with two AI hosts✦A Tinder-style swipe app for picking which open-source issue to fix next✦AR glasses that subtitle what your grandmother says in her dialect✦A browser extension that roasts your tabs until you close them✦Voice-first expense tracker you talk to while walking out of the shop✦A multiplayer whiteboard where an AI critic sketches counter-arguments✦Find a study buddy at your uni by matching your actual timetables✦A plant that texts you when it's thirsty, in the voice of a disappointed parent✦Turn any lecture recording into a 5-minute podcast with two AI hosts✦A Tinder-style swipe app for picking which open-source issue to fix next✦AR glasses that subtitle what your grandmother says in her dialect✦A browser extension that roasts your tabs until you close them✦Voice-first expense tracker you talk to while walking out of the shop✦A multiplayer whiteboard where an AI critic sketches counter-arguments✦Find a study buddy at your uni by matching your actual timetables✦A plant that texts you when it's thirsty, in the voice of a disappointed parent✦Turn any lecture recording into a 5-minute podcast with two AI hosts✦A Tinder-style swipe app for picking which open-source issue to fix next✦AR glasses that subtitle what your grandmother says in her dialect✦A browser extension that roasts your tabs until you close them✦Voice-first expense tracker you talk to while walking out of the shop✦A multiplayer whiteboard where an AI critic sketches counter-arguments✦Find a study buddy at your uni by matching your actual timetables✦A plant that texts you when it's thirsty, in the voice of a disappointed parent✦Turn any lecture recording into a 5-minute podcast with two AI hosts✦A Tinder-style swipe app for picking which open-source issue to fix next✦AR glasses that subtitle what your grandmother says in her dialect✦A browser extension that roasts your tabs until you close them✦Voice-first expense tracker you talk to while walking out of the shop✦A multiplayer whiteboard where an AI critic sketches counter-arguments✦Find a study buddy at your uni by matching your actual timetables✦

Originality · 25%◆Feasibility · 20%◆Impact · 20%◆Tech Depth · 15%◆Demo Wow · 20%◆

The panel

Each judge owns part of the rubric and has a voice of their own. They don't agree, and that's the point.

Seat 01

Moderator

The Chair

“Order. The idea is on the table.”

Final verdict

Voice · Daniel / ElevenLabs

Seat 02

Skeptical VC

The Shark

“Who pays for this, and why now?”

Impact

Voice · Brian / ElevenLabs

Seat 03

Pragmatic engineer

The Builder

“Cool. What's the hard part?”

FeasibilityTech Depth

Voice · Charlie / ElevenLabs

Seat 04

Angel investor

The Angel

“I back people first. Why you?”

Team & story

Voice · Charlotte / ElevenLabs

Seat 05

Product designer

The Visionary

“Forget the spec. Show me the moment.”

OriginalityDemo Wow

Voice · Jessica / ElevenLabs

Seat 06

Ex-founder, growth

The Operator

“Great product. How do the first 100 users find it?”

Distribution

Voice · Will / ElevenLabs

How it works

Step 01

Pitch it

Write the idea like you'd say it to a teammate: what it does, who it's for, what the demo looks like.

Summon →

Step 02

Hear the debate

Gemma 4 writes a real argument between a panel of six judges. ElevenLabs gives each one a voice. You watch it happen around the table.

Step 03

Get the verdict

Five criteria, five personal votes, one weighted score out of 100 — plus the strengths to lean on and the risks to fix.

Overall

Contender

Step 04

Sharpen & retry

Take the hardest note, rewrite the pitch, and put it back on the table. Ideas get better under cross-examination.

58→81

The rubric

Every criterion is scored 0–10, weighted, and rolled into one number out of 100. Placeholder weights for now — the event's real criteria slot straight in.

01
Originality
25%
Have the judges seen this ten times today?
02
Feasibility
20%
Can a small team ship it before the deadline?
03
Impact
20%
Does anyone actually need this?
04
Tech Depth
15%
Is there a real technical problem underneath?
05
Demo Wow
20%
Will the room remember the demo?

Put yourhackathonideaon trial.

Six seats. Six agendas.

The Chair

The Shark

The Builder

The Angel

The Visionary

The Operator

From pitch to verdict in ninety seconds.

Pitch it

Hear the debate

Get the verdict

Sharpen & retry

What the judges count.

Originality

Feasibility

Impact

Tech Depth

Demo Wow